U.S. — As the aftermath of the Lindsay Clancy mistrial continued to reverberate across the country, one member of the jury confirmed that white women were now arguing that black men should only have three-fifths of a jury vote.
Multiple jurors have come forward to be interviewed in the media, with news breaking Friday morning that the lone holdout juror who refused to find Clancy not guilty of murdering her three children was a black man who dared to think for himself and not just do what he's told.
"There should be some type of compromise in these situations," the woman said on CBS Mornings. "We were all wanting to let her off the hook for strangling her kids, but this guy was just sitting there, totally hung up on the fact that this mother viciously murdered her own children. We think, moving forward, gentlemen like this should only count for three-fifths of a jury vote. That seems fair, all things considered."
Progressives explained that individuals like the black man who sat on the jury may not be educated enough to draw a reasoned conclusion on such a complex case, similar to how women and minorities aren't intelligent enough to obtain official government identification. "We have to make special accommodations for people who aren't white liberals," the juror continued. "That's why his vote shouldn't count for quite as much as a regular person."
At publishing time, the white female jurors had also advocated for having black male jurors use their own separate water fountains and be relegated to a separate jury box.
The Babylon Bee finally exposes everything about the Jews in this documentary of hard-hitting investigative journalism.
